This page is for intermediary use only. If you're not an intermediary, please
return to our customer website
This page is for intermediary use only. If you're not an intermediary, please
return to our customer website
Adverse credit cases can be some of the most rewarding enquiries for brokers to place. They can also be among the most nuanced. A recent CCJ, a satisfied default from three years ago and a run of missed payments all sit under the adverse credit banner, but they tell very different stories.
That distinction matters. For UK mortgage brokers, successful placement is rarely about whether adverse credit exists. It is about understanding the severity of the issue, how recently it happened, whether it has been resolved and what the customer’s conduct looks like now.
As one of the UK’s leading specialist lenders, Aldermore works with brokers to look beyond solely the customer’s credit score and consider the customer’s wider circumstances. That common-sense approach can help brokers support clients who may not fit standard high street criteria but have rebuilt their finances and are ready to move forward.
A useful starting point is to think about adverse credit in three broad categories: light, moderate and heavy.
Light adverse might include older, isolated issues such as a small satisfied default, historic CCJ or short spell of missed payments linked to a temporary life event.
Moderate adverse often involves greater recency or more than one event, such as a default registered within the last two years, several missed payments or a recently satisfied CCJ.
Heavy adverse usually means more recent or unresolved issues, including recent CCJs, unsatisfied defaults, ongoing arrears or multiple events that suggest continuing financial pressure.
When a client has a CCJ, context is crucial. Lenders will usually want to understand the amount, registration date, whether it has been satisfied and what caused it. A small judgment linked to an admin dispute may be viewed very differently from a larger CCJ connected to wider financial difficulties.
CCJs registered in the last three to six months will generally attract more scrutiny than older events, but recent does not automatically mean impossible. Strong recent conduct, well-managed bank statements, stable income and a clear explanation can all improve the quality of the case.
Defaults should be assessed through the lens of recency and recovery. A default under 12 months old is likely to be treated as a more immediate risk, particularly where there are other signs of financial pressure on the credit file.
A default that is more than 12 months old, especially if satisfied, may tell a more positive story. It shows the customer has had time to rebuild, and lenders can look at what has happened since: clean credit conduct, stable employment, consistent income and sustainable affordability.
Unsatisfied defaults need more careful handling because the debt remains outstanding. That does not mean the case is unplaceable, but brokers should be ready to explain the size of the balance, the age of the default, whether it forms part of a pattern and how the rest of the application helps offset the risk.
Deposit size is one of the strongest mitigating factors in adverse credit lending. A larger deposit reduces loan-to-value and can give lenders more confidence when assessing a complex application. It will not override serious concerns, but it can widen options.
Recent conduct matters just as much. Brokers should draw attention to maintained payments, sensible bank account management, steady employment, controlled unsecured debt and evidence that the customer is now on firmer financial footing.
Before submission, it can help to decide whether the case is ready to place, should be paused for more information or needs reworking.
Place when the adverse is historic or well explained, or supported by strong recent conduct.
Pause when the case needs more information, or when waiting could put the client in a stronger position. That might mean gathering credit report, explanations or supporting evidence, or allowing time for adverse credit to drop off the file if that could make the client eligible for a more mainstream option.
Rework when the client may be better served by satisfying outstanding debts, reducing unsecured balances, building a larger deposit or allowing more time to pass after a recent credit event.
Strong packaging can make a real difference. A good broker submission does more than upload documents. It explains what happened, why it happened and why it is unlikely to happen again.
Where relevant, include context around redundancy, illness, divorce, business challenges or other life events, then balance that with the strengths of the application: affordability, deposit, employment stability, clean recent conduct and consistent income.
This is where a specialist lending partner can help. Aldermore’s experienced underwriters assess applications individually, giving brokers the opportunity to present the full customer picture rather than relying on a single credit event to define the outcome.
The most successful adverse credit cases are rarely defined by one CCJ or default. They are shaped by the customer’s journey since the event and the broker’s ability to show why the case now makes sense.
For brokers placing cases involving recent CCJs, satisfied defaults, unsatisfied defaults or multiple credit issues, the key is to focus on severity, recency and recoverability. With Aldermore’s specialist expertise, manual underwriting and broker-first approach, there may be more options than the credit file first suggests.